Barcelona’s president Joan Laporta has dismissed claims that Ilkay Gundogan’s exit was driven by financial woes.
The 33-year-old’s return to Manchester City just a year after leaving was reportedly due to ongoing high costs which were preventing Barca registering a number of new signings.
La Liga’s rules are based on the 1:1 principle, which means the amount clubs can spend on new players (including transfers, wages and agent fees) is equivalent to revenue generated.
But Laporta told a press conference that was not the reason for Gundogan’s departure.
“After a meeting with (new coach) Hansi Flick and assessing the situation of the squad, he decided that he wanted to leave.
“The signing of Dani Olmo (meant) he was a player who performs a similar function to that of Gundo.
“I have heard that it is a financial decision, but no. It’s a sporting decision, by Barca, by Gundogan and by City because he has been brought back.
“At the time Gundo came without a transfer fee and it was only fair that there was no transfer fee (for City).
“It has had an economic impact, but the reason has been a sporting decision.”
Barcelona’s overall debt had ballooned to one billion euros (£842million) in 2021, which had serious consequences – most notably not being able to afford to re-sign Lionel Messi – but Laporta insists they are almost back on track.
“To get to the 1:1 rule we are 60million euros away. We have several ways to raise the money,” he added.
“I am confident that in the next few months we can get to 1:1.”